Obama and communism…is there a connection?
http://usasurvival.org/marshall.fbi.files.html
http://usasurvival.org/obama.html
I’ve only started reading this, but I’m posting these here so I can find them later…
Seems the “Frank” character mentioned in Obama’s Dreams of My Father book is a pinko:
(Obama’s reference…. bottom of p. 4 in this doc….) http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/hawaii-obama.pdf
Who knows if any of this has any true or real relevance….but it only takes reading about the first 6 pages of the above posted document to see that maybe it should be researched more….and Obama should be asked some tough questions. One thing we do know is that the guy (Davis) is a quack….and Obama did talk about him in his book, and Obama did attend socialist rallies…so it would seem that at least this guy (in conjunction with other radicals in Obama’s life) have attributed to his own extreme-leftist leanings.
Ironic for a man who sure tries to make himself come off as conservative.
My one last NObama hurrah…Christians, are you paying attention?
You know, what encourages me most about this election is that it is not a landslide for Obama. That tells you that there are a lot of us who have not bowed down to the media slant towards him. (And I for one, am not discouraged….the fat lady has not sung yet!) At any rate, I’ve been meaning to post more about him on here, but I’ve actually been writing a lot of it on Facebook.
At any rate, if this doesn’t make a person get off their butts and stand up against this crap then I give up. (well, okay, not really, but I will tell you if the Fairness Doctrine passes…which Obama says he’s against…but all his cohorts are for and he’s NEVER voted against his party…this kind of video will be taken off the internet…
Watch it now while you have time:
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1815825713?bctid=1819819843
“Linda Harvey, president of Mission America, says many parents would be frightened to know that one of Senator Obama’s top homosexual fundraisers founded a group, namely GLSEN, which has recommended books that condone sex between men and teenage boys.”
article here:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Election2008/Default.aspx?id=294520
You want the gory details? Well, here you go: This is exactly what Obama’s GLSN fundraiser wants….
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/marriage/effects_of_ssm.html
There are several states with same-sex marriage laws on the table this election.
Obama’s connection to GLSEN:
WARNING: This article contains graphic material which many will find distasteful. It is included because it is an essential part of this story.
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Perspectives/Default.aspx?id=297506
Mission America puts it best: What’s Happening to America?
“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge…”
(Hosea 4:6 KJV)
Mission:America is dedicated to bringing the truth to America, covering trends in the culture omitted by the mainstream media. In the midst of darkness, there is still great hope… in salvation through Jesus Christ.
——
I’m done. Between this and Obama’s 100% extreme-leftist leaning record, his questionable connections to NUMEROUS characters of which he has LIED about…Ayres, Wright, Resko for a few examples… I AM DONE.
You all vote for who you want.
Obama’s moving tax threshold….he’s trying to keep us guessing..
One of the things I’ve seen at Republican rallies is that people just don’t believe Barack Obama when he says he’ll raise taxes only on those who make more than $250,000 a year. It’s not that these people make that much money or even think they’ll make that much money sometime in the next four years. It’s that they believe Obama, once in office, would lower the threshold and raise taxes on people who make less than $250,000.
Obama’s position in the past was that he would raise taxes on families making more than $250,000 a year and individuals making more than $200,000. But in his new ad, “Defining Moment,” he seems to lower it to $200,000 for families. “Here’s what I’ll do as president,” Obama says in the ad. “To deal with our current emergency I’ll launch a rescue plan for the middle class That begins with a tax cut for 95 percent of working Americans. If you have a job, pay taxes and make less than $200,000 a year, you’ll get a tax cut.” That seems kind of ambiguous, but the graphic on the screen says clearly: “Famlies making less than $200,000 get tax cut.” Now, the McCain campaign is pointing out something that Joe Biden said in a Pennsylvania TV interview yesterday:
What we’re saying is that $87 billion tax break doesn’t need to go to people making an average of 1.4 million, it should go like it used to. It should go to middle class people — people making under $150,000 a year.”
This morning, in Hershey, Pennsylvania, McCain started pushing hard:
Senator Obama has made a lot of promises. First he said people making less than 250,000 dollars would benefit from his plan, then this weekend he announced in an ad that if you’re a family making less than 200,000 dollars you’ll benefit — but yesterday, right here in Pennsylvania, Senator Biden said tax relief should only go to “middle class people — people making under 150,000 dollars a year.” It’s interesting how their definition of rich has a way of creeping down. At this rate, it won’t be long before Senator Obama is right back to his vote that Americans making just 42,000 dollars a year should get a tax increase. We can’t let that happen.
———————-
Barack Obama voted twice in favor of Democrats’ FY 2009 Budget Resolution that would raise taxes on those making just $42,000 A Year. (S. Con. Res. 70, CQ Vote #85: Adopted 51-44: R 2-43; D 47-1; I 2-0, 3/14/08, Obama Voted Yea; S. Con. Res. 70, CQ Vote #142: Adopted 48- 45: R 2- 44; D 44- 1; I 2-0, 6/4/08, Obama Voted Yea)
FactCheck.org: The Budget Resolution Would Have Allowed Most Of The Provisions Of The 2001 And 2003 Tax Cuts To Expire, Effectively Raising Taxes On Those Making $41,500 In Total Income. “What Obama voted for was a budget resolution that would have allowed most of the provisions of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts to expire. In particular, the resolution would allow the 25 percent tax bracket to return to its pre-2001 level of 28 percent. That bracket kicks in at $32,550 for an individual or $65,100 for a married couple. … But as those of you who have filled out a 1040 know, that’s not actually how income taxes work. We don’t pay taxes on our total earnings; we pay them based on our ‘taxable income.’ The Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center’s Eric Toder told FactCheck.org that ‘people with taxable income of $32,000 would have a total income greater than that.’ In 2008, anyone filing taxes with single status would be entitled to a standard deduction of $5,450, as well as a personal exemption of $3,500. So to have a taxable income high enough to reach the 25 percent bracket, an individual would need to earn at least $41,500 in total income, while a married couple would need a combined income of at least $83,000.” (“The $32,000 Question,” FactCheck.org, http://www.factcheck.org, 7/8/08)
Obama Campaign: Barack Obama Voted For A Budget Resolution That Wouldn’t Have Increased Taxes For Any Taxpayers Making Less Than $41,500. ROSEN: “Campaign aides to Senator Obama today, called the charge that he voted for tax hikes on people making only $32,000 a year, quote, ‘bogus.’ They circulated an analysis stating that the resolution that Obama had voted for would not have increase taxes on single taxpayer making less than $41,500 a year in total income.” (Fox News’ “America’s Election Headquarters,” 7/30/08)
The New York Times: Barack Obama’s “Vote Was On A Budget Resolution To Raise Taxes On People Making $41,500 A Year.” “FactCheck.org, a nonpartisan Web site, said the vote was on a budget resolution to raise taxes on people making $41,500 a year; the $32,000 figure, it said, was the amount of taxable income those people had.” (Michael Cooper, “McCain Goes Negative, Worrying Some In GOP,” The New York Times, 7/30/08)
So….where does the truth lie in the midst of all the lies? it’s a needle in a haystack and I bet Biden doesn’t even know where it is….as long as it’s under his salary, LOL….
Obama —”the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties…
In an interview with a Chicago public radio station, Obama said, “If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court. I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order as long as I could pay for it I’d be OK.“But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties.
“Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.”
(audio interview here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck)
WHAT HE FORGETS is that our country’s success and individual success is NOT dictated by the government…(actually, it’s the opposite…) I just heard an audio of Obama talking about how he wants the government to ensure everyone’s opportunity for success–think it was the Joe the Plumber clip or another one. How is this even possible? Success comes from hard work, not government handouts. He mentions by making opportunities for people to work, but what about those that DON’T WANT TO WORK? Oh, you can be he’ll “ensure their success” by making those of us that do work pay for theirs….ha ha ha…”share the wealth” folks…
I’m ashamed of this country for posing such a man for office in this nation. Shame on Obama and shame on him for dragging our Constitution through the mud.
Our nation has become a bunch of selfish self-entitlement brats. (Not everyone…just a lot of people…so nobody get mad, alright?) Tom was telling me about a quote the other day…something about how Democracy dies when people realize they can vote for their bread.
SO TRUE.
Now I think I need to go get a cup of coffee….lol…
BTW, I promised (myself) that I would not say bad things about Obama. Truth be told, I cannot speak for him or his heart or where he stands with the Lord….but there is a difference between saying bad things and saying what he said and pointing out what’s wrong with it. I don’t get how he can believe he’s a Christian and yet vote for the most anti-God things in our country. (Nobody has explained that to me either…) However, I digress from that…I just think he doesn’t tell the truth about much of anything….
Now, I have to post this for anyone interested…
http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/10/27/note-about-obama-from-a-black-christian/
It’s been circulating around and while I think the guy is wrong on the statements he makes on the economy, I do find he makes some valid points in there. And for those that say abortion is not the only issue, of course it’s not. But it’s an important issue and how he expresses that (I think) is straight-on. His comments on the economy however, leave one to think we have a choice in voting for the pro-life guy or the guy who has the answers to the economy. Well, as posted above, I hope that you all realize Obama has no answers to the economy except those that will promote socialism (no matter how much he wants to deny it, an apple is an apple whether it’s green or red!) But more on that later…basically, you’ve all heard that…his whole “spread the wealth” comment….which no matter how much the media wants to spin it, sounds like socialism to a whole lot of a lot of us out here.
What’s equally as scary as Obama getting in office is a Democrat Supermajority….that is for another day, but those two words together give me the shivers. Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi and Obama….wow….
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html#printMode
Felons get the right to vote! Terrorists can be tried in civilian courts! Bye bye Free Speech, welcome Fairness Doctrine! Hello more taxes! Whatever the majority wants, the majority gets. So you all out there thinking Obama is so hot to trot, look at how the Democrats have voted and see if it aligns with YOUR values…not just your values as a Christian but as an American.
Sigh…now for that coffee…
ah-HA! caught you again, you liberal media…
http://www.timesleader.com/news/breakingnews/Secret_Service_says_Kill_him_allegation_unfounded_.html
Why am I not surprised? Anything they can do to stir up more hatred towards conservatives…
No folks, sadly you won’t hear about this anywhere except online and the radio…journalism is dead in this country.
(And okay, yes I stole that line, but it really is true…)
and herin lies the fundamental difference between left and right-wingers…
From the Tax Policy Center at http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=411750
Both John McCain and Barack Obama have proposed tax plans that would substantially increase the national debt over the next ten years, according to a newly updated analysis by the non-partisan Tax Policy Center. Compared to current law, TPC estimates the Obama plan would cut taxes by $2.9 trillion from 2009-2018. McCain would reduce taxes by nearly $4.2 trillion. Obama would give larger tax cuts to low- and moderate-income households and pay some of the cost by raising taxes on high-income taxpayers. In contrast, McCain would cut taxes across the board and give the biggest cuts to the highest-income households.
The biggest problem I see with this is this: since it’s a well-known fact that the top income-earners in this country actually pay most of the country’s taxes (and about 30% don’t pay any) is Obama then going to GIVE those bottom non-taxpayers free money?
Free money from the government! No wonder they want him in office. Meanwhile folks like the rest of us (at least everyone I know, since I don’t really know anyone on either extreme end of the spectrum) are caught in the middle.
Personally I have a huge problem with the whole “fairness” ideal and I’m not even rich. Well, not rich in the American sense of the word. We struggle every month with paying the bills and meeting the needs of our kids and everything else…and I don’t carry Coach purses or have DVR. I have my own business that I work my butt off for and my husband works his off at his job too.
I know, I know, I’m forgetting the rhetoric…only if you make MORE than $250,000 will you get an increase! Well good grief…shucks, by golly, give me my $1000 tax cut…it’s okay if you tax my hubby’s employer to the point that next year he doesn’t have a job! I got me a tax credit!
YIPPEE.
This is the man people expect to unify our nation…
(Barack Obama in Dreams from My Father)
“The emotions between the races could never be pure. Even love was tarnished by the desire to find in the other some element that was missing in ourselves. Whether we sought out our demons or our salvation, the other race would always remain just that: menacing, alien, and apart.
